Why was the Late Roman Army so much worse at replacing
2020年3月11日 · Even in the 5th and 6th centuries the Eastern Roman army remained a vast professional force with far more manpower than just about any of its rivals. (Sassanid Persia aside.) The Western Roman army was severely weakened by the crisis of the 5th century, and eventually ceased to exist, but this is no longer believed to be an issue of manpower.
How large was the Roman army at it's peak? : r/AskHistorians
2014年11月24日 · The roman army was comprised of 33 legions in 200AD. In 30BC, Augustus formed his legions into nine "cohorts" of 480 men, one "double strength" cohort of 800 men (the first cohort) and a cavalry squadron of 128. Therefore there were around 5,248 men in a theoretical legion, including various officers. On paper there were 173,184 men in the ...
What would be the modern day equivalents of roman - Reddit
2015年4月10日 · Tribunes: (depending on experience & political ranking) - Major to Lt. Colonel. Legion Legatus: Brig. General. Imperial Legatus (Imperator): General. Don't forget that it's difficult to compare modern day military rankings with Roman legion rankings because modern day military officers do not hold political office while in service.
Did Roman legions actually march 20 miles a day? : …
2020年11月9日 · Vegetius claims Roman recruits should be trained to march 20 Roman miles (30km) a day in roughly six hours at the ordinary step, and 24 miles (35.5 km) at a full step. Many histories of a more or less popular character take this as a standard marching pace for Roman armies, and Stanford Orbis uses 30km as a typical military march and 60km as a ...
Roman Army : r/AskHistorians - Reddit
2017年10月23日 · The Roman army of the Empire numbered hundreds of thousands of men. Agathias claims that the army reached the extraordinary size of 645,000 men, while Zosimus claims a lower figure of 581,000. John Lydus gives a more reasonable figure of 390,000 during the time of Diocletian – an amount similar to the army under Hadrian.
How do you guys think Roman infantry would fare against ... - Reddit
2020年2月24日 · Very true. A proper, on campaign, Roman army would have had to some degree light infantry, archers/slingers, cavalry (light, medium and depending on time frame, cataphracts and clibinarii) in addition to the heavy infantry most people think of. On top of that, the Romans occasionally used scorpions as field artillery.
What is the strongest army the Romans ever put in the field?
Ceasers army that fought the Gauls, then went on to fight Pompey, the Ptolemys, and Pontus had to have been some of the best, most deadly legionaries rome had ever put into the field. Caesars Legionaries were absolute work horses. Definitely one of the deadliest and most productive legions in Roman history.
Were the ancient Roman armies more effective than medieval
The Roman army of Trajan would have crushed any medieval army, for one basic reason: the Roman army, unlike the levies and knights called together by medieval kings, was a professional fighting force. Its armies had training and - more importantly - financial and logistical resources that no medieval state could match.
Why was the late Roman Army so small? The numbers don
2021年7月20日 · But even then, it seems hard to justify the really small size of the Roman Armies fielded in these battles when compared to two things: (1) the supposed absolute size of the Roman army (400-650k) and (2) the Roman armies during the Republic. Especially when you also consider the following factors: the Roman Empire had much larger territories ...
My historical 4th-century late Roman infantry character build.
2020年4月25日 · My character build was hugely inspired by the late Roman army and it took me ages to put it together. Here's the concept of it . That being said, I used late Roman army mods for my troops as well (which is similar to my build). - Late Roman army (4th-5th century) by Bullero. - Historical late roman banner by Mainblocks. Build: -Faceguard helmet.