opening - How bad is the Elephant Gambit? - Chess Stack Exchange
Typical analysis is only 4 moves deep claiming White is better (as shown in some answers below). I had never seen 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 d5 3.exd5 Bd6 given as "Elephant Gambit Proper" on wikipedia (link in Kortchnoi's answer); The wiki, by-the-way, quotes De Firmian analysis which is pre-computer analysis. opening.
Why is the Elephant Gambit so good practically? How to punish
Jun 22, 2021 · The Elephant Gambit is a good response in online games with short time control. Possible reasons: There’s an element of surprise because it’s rare. This gives Black a psychological edge. Because it’s rare and in online chess you don’t specifically prepare for openings, the Black player is better prepared and has more experience than ...
Elephant gambit : r/chess - Reddit
Oct 25, 2020 · There's also 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 d5 3. exd5 Bd6 called Elephant Gambit: Maróczy Gambit wich aims for a fast attack against white's kingside, I think it gives less chances that the other lines I have. Good for blitz/bullet though.
Elephant Gambit: why does the computer want the center pawns …
Jul 4, 2022 · But in the Elephant Gambit you have concrete reasons to play that way: the ones I explained above. And in every chess position, concrete reasons always trump general considerations. For example, they say to avoid trading your Bishop for a Knight, and yet this is the main strategic idea behind the Nimzo-Indian defense, one of the best defenses ...
What are peoples' thoughts on the Latvian Gambit? : r/chess
Jul 11, 2012 · It's terrible. It's exactly like playing the King's Gambit, which is already rocky, but with the huge improvement of the Nf3. If you are serious about improving at chess, put in the work and learn a real opening. Here's me beating the Latvian Gambit against a master: [pgn] [White "KittyFooFoo"] [Black "2350"] [Result "1-0"]
The exhilarating elephant gambit book : r/chess - Reddit
Jun 27, 2021 · The exhilarating elephant gambit book. I know elephant gambit is supposed to be bad for black according to theory or computer. Quality chess usually publishes some good books this book covers the gambit deeply. I had the chance to look through the book briefly and it seemed very in depth with model games. Perhaps as a surprise weapon in blitz ...
Why are some openings deemed unsuitable to be someone's …
Sep 11, 2021 · First, I get the idea that the Elephant Gambit for instance is basically unplayable after a certain level in a non-blitz format. I just wanted to get that out of the way because I understand when an opening just shouldn't be played if someone doesn't want to lose.
Being playing for like 2 years now, just wondering anyone ever
Apr 1, 2019 · 1.1M subscribers in the chess community. All about the game of chess, including discussions on professional tournaments, game analysis and theory.
Origins of the Elephant trap name - Chess Stack Exchange
Aug 28, 2024 · The original piece was indeed called an elephant, which is the source of Russian "slon" ("elephant") for the modern Bishop, as well as the Spanish "alfil" (from Arabic al-fil, "the elephant") and related words in other languages. But it was a much weaker piece -- e.g. the medieval alfil/elephant is a (2,2)-leaper -- and the opening trap wouldn ...
Names of all Gambits - Chess Stack Exchange
There is no authority on opening names, so giving an exhaustive list is impossible. The following is a complete list of all gambits in the ECO. Schuhler Gambit 1. b4 c6 2. Bb2 a5 3. b5 cxb5 4. e4. Wolferts Gambit 1. b4 e5 2. Bb2 c5. Vienna Gambit 1. e4 e5 2. Nc3 Nf6 3. f4. Quaade Gambit 1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3.