To save time for authors and peer-reviewers, only those papers that seem most likely to meet our editorial criteria are sent for formal review. Those papers judged by the editors to be of ...

The Editor-in-Chief must approve all accept and reject decisions, except when away or recused from peer review. Authors can expect to learn of a decision on their paper approximately 4 weeks after ...

If you currently have a manuscript in peer review, you will see a status message on your Author Dashboard in ScholarOne ... Decisions letters are proofread in the order in which the manuscript was ...

We reduce bias in peer review by asking our editors and reviewers to: be aware of potential unconscious biases focus on the science instead of the names, locations or career stages of the authors take ...

The volume of research outputs is growing, and the work of peer reviewers is more important than ever. Having a large, diverse peer review network can reduce the time it takes to find the right ...

Major change recommendations varied significantly by cancer type and the timing of peer review, with post hoc reviews yielding more changes than real-time reviews. However, researchers found no ...

The Elective Care Transformation Programme developed a specification for clinical peer review which involves GPs reviewing each other’s new referrals to provide constructive feedback to the referring ...

Part of the Internal Justice Services of the World Bank Group (WBG), Peer Review Services (PRS) offers WBG employees the opportunity to receive an independent, objective and impartial review, by a ...